Geosyntec's client needed to assess redevelopment options for a 15-acre property that formerly housed a metal fabricating facility, now demolished, leaving only the concrete floor slabs. Historic use of chlorinated solvents at the site dating to the 1930s resulted in impacts to soil beneath the slabs.
We had previously conducted environmental investigations and developed a management program for the property that recommended maintaining the existing floor slabs and paving to restrict stormwater infiltration and potential leaching of solvents to a nearby surface water receptor. This allowed redevelopment and re-use of the property for mixed commercial/residential use. However, assessments of subsurface vapor intrusion to indoor air and the potential for human health risks to occupants of any future buildings were needed for liability management. Geosyntec was asked to develop an approach for performing an extensive yet cost-effective sub-slab vapor investigation that would allow site redevelopment.
Geosyntec's Scope of Services
Geosyntec used Visual Sampling Plan (VSP) software to design a sampling grid, but for a property this large, the sampling grid contained 206 locations, which would have been prohibitively expensive using conventional methods. Our approach was to use three assessment methods, each with progressive costs, and an optimized scope to characterize the site:
- We initially conducted field screening at all locations using a portable photoionization detector (PID) after collecting soil gas samples in a Tedlar® bag, which is the least expensive method available. These data provided relative concentrations adequate to identify areas of interest but did not identify the individual components or their relative concentrations.
- In areas of interest identified with the PID, we deployed Waterloo Membrane Samplers (WMS) and analytical services to yield approximate concentrations of the various chemicals at each location at less than half of the cost of conventional analysis.
- At a limited number of locations, we conducted verification soil gas sampling using Summa® canisters for analysis by EPA Method TO-15 (i.e., the conventional method, which is also the most expensive) to calibrate and validate the much more cost-effective PID and WMS samples.
Geosyntec generated a comprehensive sub-slab vapor profile to identify vapor concentration and chemical composition and used these data to estimate indoor vapor inhalation risks. The results indicated that new ground-level residential construction would require expensive protective measures to address potential vapor intrusion. Our approach allowed our client to complete the assessment for about one quarter of the cost of performing the same scope of work using conventional sampling and analysis. The property was sold to a developer for a $60-million retail development with the condition that an active vapor mitigation system be installed beneath all ground level occupied spaces. Geosyntec then worked with the developer to design the vapor mitigation system and provide construction quality assurance, satisfying the state regulatory agency and the terms of the sales agreement.
Quick QualNo pages found in your document. What is a Quick Qual?
- Location: Knoxville, Tennessee
- Client: GPI Interim, Inc.
- Project Practice Areas: Contaminated Sites, Air Quality
- Type of Facility: Former manufacturer
- Services Provided: Subslab vapor investigation, Demonstrated cost savings over tradition vapor sampling, Produced detailed subsurface vapor map, Informed vapor mitigation design for Brownfields site redevelopment
- Type of Work: Vapor intrusion assessment and mitigation
- Governing Regulation: Voluntary